A response to hugh lafolettes paper licensing parents

a response to hugh lafolettes paper licensing parents Section i section ii this list is primarily derived from pojman, louis j, environmental ethics: readings in theory and application, 2nd ed(belmont, ca: wadsworth publishing company), 1997 section i: ethics/philosophy.

Licensing parents hugh lafollette lafollette’s thesis and argument is that we should require all parents or potential parents to procure a license prior to having children. - supporting arguments for parent licensing in hugh lafollette’s paper, “licensing parents” he talks about the need for government licensing of parents his argument states that for any activity that is harmful to others, requires competence, and has a reliable procedure for determining competence, should require licensing by the government. Carefully explain hugh lafollette’s argument that parents should be “licensed” in his essay licensing parents custom essay [meteor_slideshow slideshow=”arp1″] carefully explain hugh lafollette’s argument that parents should be “licensed” in his essay licensing parents. Positive argument for parent licensing in the status quo, parenting is considered a right, but it should be considered a privilege hugh lafollette’s paper, “is licensing parents wrong” suggests that the government should. Reviews i consider this to be the best collection available in applied ethics in terms of teaching students about constructing and understanding philosophical argument--clare palmer, washington university in st louis each chapter is structured around not only a specific moral debate, but a particular argument.

Lafollettes-licensing of paren “licensing parents” would the licensing of parents be morally right and theoretically possible according to hugh lafollette in his essay “licensing parents,” it is and would be both right and possible to do so. In the article licensing parents, hugh lafollette controversially takes licensing one step further and concludes that the state should morally require people to obtain a license before becoming parents. Hugh lafollette: licensing parents what is lafollette's considered view on licensing parents a it sounds like a good idea, but it would actually violate people's rights b it is theoretically desirable, but it could not be applied in practice c it is both theoretically desirable and practically applicable. Licensing parents hugh lafollette - 1980 - philosophy and public affairs 9 (2):182-197 in this essay i shall argue that the state should require all parents to be licensed my main goal is to demonstrate that the licensing of parents is theoretically desirable, though i shall also argue that a workable and just licensing program actually.

Licensing parents is the latest scheme to have all-knowing, always benevolent state bureaucrats dictate the lifelong relationships of all vulnerable beings. The last century has witnessed some of the most divisive and confrontational debates in human history--and many of these have focused on the institution of the family now, two generations after the contraceptive revolution, the very right of parents to bear and raise children is under renewed attack the implications of this debate will range far beyond the question of parental fitness. Hugh lafollette is marie e and leslie cole professor in ethics at the university of south florida st petersburg he is editor-in-chief of the international encyclopedia of ethics (2013, wiley-blackwell), author of three books, including the practice of ethics (2007) and editor of six more, in ethics. Hugh lafollette’s defense of the claim that the state should license parents is perhaps the most influential and widely discussed version of the philosophical argument in favor of parental licensing (lafollette 1980. (a/ /03) in response to the objection that licensing parents is morally impermissible on the grounds that parents have a right to rear children, lafollette claims that: [a] this objection's premise that parents have a right to rear children is consistent with his argument to license parents [b] this objection misunderstands his argument [c.

Libertarianism and parental licensing back in december of 2011, i posted “licensing parents,” defending a view hugh lafollette had introduced into philosophical literature in 1980: that the state should license parents (lafollette further defended this stance in 2010 see note 1. This is the central theme in peg tittle’s book should parents be licensed debating the subject of licensing parents is more likely to attract outrage and derision than serious reflection or debate philosophers, psychologists, and social workers have advanced this idea for 30+ years, notably hugh lafollette in his seminal essay. Hugh lafollette defends the idea of licensing parents on the grounds that: [a] the state requirement to love children is an extraordinary incentive for parents to love their children [b] it is entirely unreasonable to expect parents to love their children if they are not required by the state to do so. Parents must be pedagogically educated with keeping in mind a number of social, and economic changes that alter the family and the overall social environment, which ultimately makes lafollette proposal for licensing parents superfluous.

The debates here are heavily influenced by various seminal philosophical claims -- derek parfit's identification of the non-identity problem, joel feinberg's defense of a child's right to an 'open future,' and hugh lafollette's assertion that parents should be licensed. The latter argument was set forth by hugh lafollette in philosophy and public affairs way back in 1980 (before i was born) in his paper cleverly named “licensing parents” his case is more. License to procreate the question “should people procreate” is a very opinionated one there is no right or wrong answer just a personal opinion based on facts to support it, i happen to side with hugh lafollette in his essay “licensing parents.

A response to hugh lafolettes paper licensing parents

a response to hugh lafolettes paper licensing parents Section i section ii this list is primarily derived from pojman, louis j, environmental ethics: readings in theory and application, 2nd ed(belmont, ca: wadsworth publishing company), 1997 section i: ethics/philosophy.

Parents play a very important role in the lives of their children they have to build a solid foundation for their kids in order for them to have a successful and rewarding life the foundation needs to be built at an early age, and needs to keep being built throughout the child”s early adolescence. Get this from a library ethics in practice : an anthology [hugh lafollette] -- the fourth edition of ethics in practice offers an impressive collection of 70 new, revised, and classic essays covering 13 key ethical issues essays integrate ethical theory and the discussion of. Why we ought to license parents factor in a huge array of factors that determines whether someone makes a good parent or not indeed, according to hugh lafollette, adopted children “are five times less likely to be abused than children reared by their biological parents” (60) thus far this paper has focused on the idea that.

  • A 3,000 word assessed essay (topics 1-4) to be submitted in time to allow for feedback before second essay (45%) a 3,000 word assessed essay (topics 5-9) to be submitted after the module concludes.
  • Lafolette, “licensing parents” may 10 should parents be licensed frisch, “on licentious licensing: a reply to hugh lafollette” week 7 may 15 should drugs be legal smith, “drugs, morality and the law” may 17 should drugs be legal (essay due) orlett, “taking drugs.
  • Abstract in this essay i shall argue that the state should require all parents to be licensed my main goal is to demonstrate that the licensing of parents is theoretically desirable, though i shall also argue that a workable and just licensing program actually could be established.

This paper is an extension of hugh lafollette’s original philosophical work, “licensing parents”, which was published in philosophy and public affairs in 1980 i use lafollette’s framework to discuss the ways the system would work in practice and to respond to various counterarguments against the idea. In his essay licensing parent, hugh lafollette defended the following view d both a and c a licensing parents is at the very least a way of recognizing adults who could clearly be good parents vs adulst who clearly woudl not be. In this paper we re-examine hugh lafollette's proposal that the state carefully determine the eligibility and suitability of prospective parents before granting them a ‘license to parent’ assuming a prima facie case for licensing parents.

A response to hugh lafolettes paper licensing parents
Rated 4/5 based on 44 review

2018.